Ben completed pupillage under the supervision of Adam Birkby in September 2020 and accepts instructions across all aspects of common law.
Before joining chambers, Ben read modern languages at the University of Edinburgh. He converted to law with a GDL, achieving a distinction and several prizes for exam performance in tort, land law, and EU law.
Ben is also a qualified mediator with success in both national and international student mediation and negotiation competitions.
Ben speaks French, Spanish and Portuguese. He also speaks some Lithuanian.
He undertakes prosecution and defence work in both the Magistrates’ and the Crown Court. His more notable recent cases have involved serious offences, including death by careless driving which involved a successful defence of automatism, rape and sexual assault, industrial scale cannabis cultivation and supply, and assisting an offender after a drive-by shooting.
He recently enjoyed success in the Court of Appeal, achieving a one-third reduction in the custodial term.
He also acts in private prosecutions covering environmental offences or offences of animal cruelty.
Prosecuting a male who was found unfit to plead in a case involving the highjacking of an emergency ambulance and it being subsequently driven dangerously across Leeds. The case involved marshalling evidence from a substantial number of witnesses and footage from pursuing police vehicles and the police helicopter. A hospital order with restrictions was ultimately imposed.
Defending in a case of assisting an offender in the cleaning of a car after a drive-by shooting, Ben recognised the need for expert medical evidence to substantiate a novel point of the defendant’s case. The defendant was exploited by a family member who knew she suffered from a severe preoccupation with cleanliness. Psychological reports were able to offer an innocent explanation for the Defendant’s focus on an area of a vehicle from which a firearm had been discharged earlier in the day, such that the Crown ultimately opted to offer no evidence.
18 month custodial term reduced to 12 months to reflect mitigation and credit in case of repeat assault on emergency workers while heavily in drink.
Appeared for the defence at the first hearing and PTPH in a death by careless driving case. Advised on the defence of automatism which was successfully deployed, the Crown offering no evidence. The Defendant had been stung by a wasp whilst rounding a bend in the road, killing an elderly passenger in an oncoming vehicle.
Defended in an appeal against conviction in a case of threatening a member of staff working for a local MP.
Defending in a PWIT Class A case where the defendant maintained he was present at a drugs den to buy rather than to sell drugs. Secured a suspended sentence, having persuaded court to sentence outside the guidelines on account of the defendant’s youth and the unjustifiable delay in bringing the case to trial
Defended in an industrial scale cannabis cultivation and supply case, where the Defendant was renting a number of properties out to an organised crime gang. Successfully persuaded the judge to sentence outside the guidelines. The Defendant was sentenced to 3 years rather than the usual 8 years where the estimated yield was at least 44 kilos.
Ben completed a programme of weekly advisory work for the Care Quality Commission which considered the merits of potential reasonable excuse defences for breach of s33 Health and Social Care Act 2008. The thoroughness of his preparation was praised by his instructing solicitor at the CQC, who also commended his clear, consistently sound advice.
Ben has an established practice in professional disciplinary work. He regularly drafts statements of case, advises on case preparation, and presents for Social Work England in both interim and substantive hearings. His work has involved such issues as the admission of evidence given out of the jurisdiction, adverse inferences, hearsay and bad character.
Tribunals have commended his focused and fair submissions.
He is especially keen to develop his practice in this area, making full use of the skills he has developed in criminal work from the lower courts to the Court of Appeal.
Ben’s family practice is growing. He adopts the same forensic approach to case preparation as he does in his criminal practice.
He conducts all manner of private family work, including in child arrangement applications and applications for injunctive relief. Instructing solicitors note the trust he inspires in those he represents. He particularly welcomes early involvement in cases and is more than happy to advise on case preparation in advance of final hearings. He is committed to effective and timely communication with lay and professional clients.
He has also accepted instructions in matrimonial finance work.
Representing the applicant father in a contact dispute at a final hearing. The mother refused to permit contact, suggesting any desire for contact was a ploy to secure leave to remain in the UK. The mother’s attempt to adjourn the final hearing were objected to, and the bench were apprised of the issues and invited to indicate their view of the merits of the father’s application for contact. Armed with this indication, the case was stood down for the respondent mother to agree contact arrangements.
A final hearing in a specific issue application by the client mother who sought a change of school for her daughter. Her daughter had been severely under served by the special needs provision of the current school. This was contested by the father, who sought for the child to remain in her nearest school. The magistrates’ granted the application.
Representing the applicant in a contested final hearing for a non-molestation order preventing contact after allegations of domestic abuse. A fact finding hearing was deemed unnecessary on the basis the respondent was serving custodial sentenced for breach of the interim non-molestation orders, sparing the applicant the ordeal of giving evidence. Broad protection was granted to the applicant in the final protective orders sought.
Representing the respondent mother in the father’s application for contact with the child after limited admissions of domestic abuse, a finding of fact hearing was avoided and concerns about the mother obstructing stepped interim contact were allayed. The bench were persuaded to step back from reallocating the case to a district judge, accepting that the client mother required space and time to properly engage with the inevitability of contact between the child and father. Ultimately, final contact arrangements were arrived at entirely by consent.
Ben’s practice is a mixture of purely advisory and court-based work. He accepts instructions from insurers in RTAs.
He has advised about liability under the OLA regimes in respect of users of private access roads, liability for public authorities from third party use of land, and contractual disputes.
He has also been instructed to advise a local authority about excessive user, injunctive relief and private rights of way generally.